Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Zalozhnykh, Yu. S. Slavophiles and Neoslavophiles: The Problem of Category Content in Spiritual Practice of the Russian Society

Abstract: The article is devoted to the issues of singular terminology of Slavophilism and Neoslavophilism. The author of the article describes how these two movements developed and were related to each other. The author describes the general features as well as the main, fundamental difference in theoretical heritage of the main founders of early Slavophilism, late Slavophilism, Pochvennichestvo and modern Neoslavophilism of the XXI century. The author of the article underlines that today it is impossible to solve the main problems and key issues of history and culture raised by the first Slavophiles in the XIX century. The author of the article formulates a series of general provisions of early Slavophilism that are mandatory for all modern Slavophilism theories (critics of mindless imitation of Western experience, idea of the distinctive character and origin of the Russian culture, acceptance of Orthodoxy as the spiritual basis for our national culture and etc.). The author shows how topical and important these ideas are for today’s society and how these ideas can be used for formation of a perspective model of Russia’s future development.


Keywords:

slavophiles, neoslavophiles, distinctive character, culture, tradition, succession, world view, perspective, Orthodoxy, modern age.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Belinskiy V.G. Izbrannye filosofskie sochineniya. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1957. T. 2. 594 s.
2. Belov V.N. Nasledie slavyanofil'stva: proshloe i nastoyashchee // Materialy VII Vserossiyskikh chteniy, posvyashchennykh brat'yam Kireevskim “Optina pustyn' i russkaya kul'tura”. Kaluga: KGPU im. K.E. Tsiolkovskogo, 2009. S. 16-23.
3. Ermichev A.A. Lad'ya u podnozh'ya kresta. O probleme razuma u P.Ya. Chaadaeva // Voprosy filosofii. 2000. ¹ 12. S. 171-179.
4. Levitskiy S.A. Ocherki po istorii russkoy filosofii. M.: Kanon, 1996. 494 s.
5. Popov E.A. Kul'tura, obshchestvo i chelovek v ob'ektno-predmetnom pole sovremennoy sotsial'noy kul'turologii i sotsiologii kul'tury // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. 2013. ¹ 3. C. 170-204. [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_415.html].
6. Russkaya filosofiya: entsiklopediya / pod obshch. red. M.A. Maslina; sost. P.P. Apryshko, A.P. Polyakov. M.: Algoritm, 2007. 736 s.
7. Strel'tsov A.S. Russkaya filosofsko-religioznaya shkola: Opyt gnoseoditsii russkoy filosofii. Kaluga: Eydos, 2000. 179 s.
8. Teslya A.A. Neoslavyanofil'stvo v period pervoy russkoy revolyutsii i stanovleniya «dumskoy mo-narkhii» (po materialam dnevnika A.A. Kireeva 1905-1910 gg.). [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http:// rummuseum.ru/portal/node/2224/ (data obrashcheniya: 14.07.2013)].
9. Fateev V.A. V sporakh o samobytnom puti Rossii // Slavyanofil'stvo: Pro et contra. SPb: RKhGA, 2006. 1056 s.
10. Filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 5 t. / pod red. F.V. Konstantinova. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1960-1970. [Elektronnyy resurs — URL: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enc_philosophy/ (data obrashcheniya: 01.08.2013)].
11. Florovskiy G.V. Puti russkogo bogosloviya / otv. red. O.A. Platonov. M.: Institut russkoy tsivi-lizatsii, 2009. 848 s.
12. Tsimbaev N.I. Slavyanofil'stvo. Iz istorii russkoy obshchestvenno-politicheskoy mysli XIX v. M.: MGU, 1986. 272 s