Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

National Security
Reference:

Bazhenov, A. A., Cherniatyeva, V. G. Methodological Grounds of Business Valuation

Abstract: The author of the article analyzes the modern state of valuation activities in the Russian Federation and views both legislative and methodological problems directly related to business valuation. The author evidently shows that there is a need in using an independent method of business valuation as an efficient instrument of managing a company in the system of national economy. The author also describes the structure and analyzes valuation methods, the latter including a significant number of different approaches to valuating the cost of a company. The author proves that it is necessary to improve existing valuation methods and develop (or improve) economic instruments so that they would cover all the numerous issues related to business valuation. At the same time, the author notes that the concept of economic profit can be used as the basis for creating new models and business valuation methods which would take into account the system approach.


Keywords:

assessment, cost, business, method, complex, advantage, disadvantage, activity, model.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Buloshnikova E. Model' diskontirovaniya budushchikh denezhnykh potokov ili metod kapitalizatsii dokhodov? // Konsul'tant. 2011. ¹ 9. S. 25-28.
2. Zuev D. Otsenka biznesa dokhodnym podkhodom: ozhidaniya investora opravdayutsya // Konsul'tant. 2011. ¹ 13. S. 18-22.
3. Kibitkina N. Otsenka biznesa: ot teorii k praktike // Konsul'tant, 2011, ¹ 17.
4. Kosorukova I.V., Sekachev S.A., Shuklina M.A. Otsenka stoimosti tsennykh bumag i biznesa: Uchebnoe posobie pod red. I.V. Kosorukovoy "Moskovskaya finansovo-promyshlennaya akademiya", 2011.
5. Ob otsenochnoy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: zakon Ros. Federatsii ot 29 iyulya 1998 g. ¹ 135-FZ // Sobr. zakon. – va. – 1998,-03 avgusta ¹ 31, st. 3813, Ros. gaz.-1998.-06 avgusta ¹ 148-149.
6. Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo standarta otsenki "Obshchie ponyatiya otsenki, podkhody k otsenke i trebovaniya k provedeniyu otsenki (FSO ¹1): prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya RF ot 20 iyulya 2007 g. ¹ 256. // Ros. gaz.-2007.-04 sentyabrya ¹ 194.
7. Ob utverzhdenii Federal'nogo standarta otsenki "Opredelenie kadastrovoy stoimosti (FSO ¹4): prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya RF ot 22 oktyabrya 2010 g. ¹ 508.
8. Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo standarta otsenki "Trebovaniya k otchetu ob otsenke (FSO ¹3): prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya RF ot 20 iyulya 2007 g. ¹ 254. // Ros. gaz.-2007.-05 sentyabrya ¹ 195.
9. Ob utverzhdenii federal'nogo standarta otsenki "Tsel' otsenki i vidy stoimosti (FSO ¹2): prikaz Minekonomrazvitiya RF ot 20 iyulya 2007 g. ¹ 255. // Ros. gaz.-2007.-04 sentyabrya ¹ 194.
10. Ozeryanova A. Mozhno li seychas rasschitat' real'nuyu stoimost' biznesa? // Konsul'tant. 2010. ¹ 9. S. 16-19.
11. Salmin P.S., Polyaeva O.V. Problemy otsenki stoimosti organizatsii (na primere OAO "Nizhegorodskiy port") // Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika. 2009. ¹ 34. S. 55-62.
12. Sarkisyants A. Investitsionnaya otsenka kompaniy i bankov. Sovremennye tendentsii v mezhdunarodnoy praktike // Bukhgalteriya i banki. 2011. ¹ 1. S. 45-53.
13. Teryukhov V.E. Sovremennyy podkhod k upravleniyu riskami pri otsenke biznesa i platezhesposobnosti zaemshchika // Finansy. 2010. ¹ 3. S. 56-58