Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Nota Bene. Books, journals, publishing technologies.
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate ☒
Library
 Your profile
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Vorontsova, I. V. Marcel Herbert’s Symbolism and Christian Modernism

Abstract: Ideological grounds of Roman-Catholic Modernism and Russian Christian Modernism (‘Neo- Christianity’) doctrines included symbolism. The article raises a question about M. Herbert’s ‘symbolism’ and its role for the Russian Christian modernism combined with the problems of traditional religious consciousness during that period (1880-1910) The author also touches upon the relation between Catholic modernism and Herbert’s philosophy. French modernism was closely connected with pragmatism and Russian researchers studied both phenomena at the same time. Discussion of the Russian religious intelligentsia (1909-1910) turned out to be related to epistemological problem just as Herbert imaged. Both Herbert and modernists became disappointed in ‘symbolism’ as a mediatory mean of denoting the transcendental.

Keywords:

philosophy, Neo-Christianity, Herbert, symbolism, Divine, Savoyard symbol, Modernism, Merezhkovsky, theology, consciousness.

This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Vorontsova I.V. «My zhivem na povorote mirovoy istorii…»: Voprosy khristianskogo modernizma v perepiske «neokatolikov» i «neokhristian» (1907-1911) // Vestnik PSTGU. 2011. (II). ¹
2. S. 35-47. 2. Vorontsova I.V. «Religioznyy pragmatizm» kak odin iz putey «modernizatsii» religioznogo so-znaniya v 1-e desyatiletie KhKh v. // Voprosy filosofii. 2012. ¹ 10. S. 75-84.
3. Vorontsova I.V. Osnovopolagayushchie cherty khristianskogo modernizma (konets XIX — nachalo KhX vv.) // Voprosy filosofii. 2010. ¹ 10. S. 51-61.
4. Vorontsova I.V. Polemika «neokhristian» i marksistov o religioznom soznanii // Gumanitarnye nauki v Sibiri. 2010. ¹ 4. S. 29-33.
5. Vorontsova I.V. Poslednyaya stat'ya Dzhordzha Tirrelya kak pokazatel' otnosheniya «neokhristianstva» k rimo-katolicheskomu «modernizmu» // Voprosy filosofii. 2011. ¹ 10. S. 75-82.
6. Vorontsova I.V. Revolyutsiya i religiya v diskussii 1906-1914 gg. D.S. Merezhkovskogo, N.A. Berdyaeva i P.B. Struve i drugikh // Religiovedenie. 2011. ¹ 4. C. 28-39.
7. Vorontsova I.V. Religiozno-filosofskaya mysl' v nachale KhKh v. monografiya. M.: PSTGU, 2008.
8. Dzheyms U. Chto takoe pragmatizm? [1906] (http://www.philosophy.ru/library/james/pragma.html).
9. Merezhkovskiy D. Misticheskoe dvizhenie nashego veka // Akropol'. Izbrannye literaturno-kri-ticheskie stat'i. M., 1991. S. 172-178.
10. Merezhkovskiy D.S. Nachalo novogo idealizma v proizvedeniyakh Turgeneva, Goncharova, Dostoevskogo i L. Tolstogo // O prichinakh upadka i novykh techeniyakh sovremennoy russkoy literatury. SPb., 1893. S. 37-57.
11. Russo Zh.-Zh. Emil', ili O vospitanii / Per. s frants. M.A. Engel'gardta. SPb., 1912.
12. Sabat'e O. Kriticheskaya teoriya religioznogo poznaniya / Per. N. Muretovoy // Sovremennye techeniya religiozno-filosofskoy mysli vo Frantsii. Pg., 1915. C. 21-59.
13. Spor o pragmatizme // Russkaya mysl'. 1910. Kn. V. S. 121-156.
14. Tareev M., prof. Istina i simvoly v oblasti dukha. Sv.-Tr. Sergieva lavra, 1905.
15. Tirrel' G. V zashchitu modernistov // Moskovskiy ezhenedel'nik. 1909. ¹ 36. S. 39-54.
16. Eber M. Pragmatizm, issledovanie ego razlichnykh form: anglo-amerikanskikh, frantsuzskikh, ita-l'yanskikh i ego religioznogo znacheniya / Per. 2-ogo fr. izd. Z.A. Vvedenskoy p/r. M.A. Likhareva, s pred. prof. A.I. Vvedenskogo. SPb., 1911.
17. Bampton. J.M. Modernism and modern thought. L.: Edinburgh, 1908. (http://maritain.nd.edu/jmc/etext/ mamt.htm).
18. Hébert M. Anonyme ou polyonyme. Seconde étude sur la ‘personalité divine // Revue de métaphysique et de morale. 1903. March. R. 231-247.
19. Hébert M. La faillite du catholicisme despotique // Revue blanche. 1903. March, 30. R. 439-457.
20. Hebert M. The last idol: Study of the Divine personality // Revue de métaphysique et de morale. 1902, Vol. 10, ¹. 4. R. 397-408.
21. Hébert M., proff. Le Divine. Expériences et hipothèses: études psychologiques. P., 1907.
22. Hébert M., abbé. Souvenirs d’Assise // La revue blanche. 1902. (T. XXIX). ¹ 223. R. 81-550.
23. Hébert M., abbé. Thomism and Kantianism // Annales de philosophie chrétienne. 1886. ¹ 13. January. R. 364-384.
24. Houtin A. Un prêtre symboliste. Marcel Hébert (1851-1916). P., 1925.
25. Lilley A.L. Modernism: a record and review. L., 1908.
26. Loisy A. Quelques letters sur des questions actuelles et sur des événements récents. Ceff., 1908.
27. Loisy A. Simples rèflecxions sur le Décret du Saint Office Lamentabily Sane Exetu et sur l’Encyclique Pascendi Dominici Gregis. Ceff., 1908.
28. Moréas J. Le Symbolisme. Figaro. 1886. Sept 18. P. 1-2.
29. Poulat E. Histoire, dogme et critique dans la crise moderniste. Paris, Casterman, 1962.
30. Sabatier O. Esquisse d’une philosophie de la religion d’aprés la psychologie et l’histoire. Paris, 1897.
31. Schloesser S. Review // H-France Review. 2012. Vol. 12, ¹ 88. R. 1-7.
32. Talar C.J.T. Introduction // The Modernist as philosopher: selected writings of Marcel Hebert. W., 2011. P. 1-24.
33. Vidler A. The Modernist movement in the Roman Church. Its origins & outcome. L., 1934.
34. Vidler A.R. A variety of Catholic modernists. Cambridge, 1970
Nota Bene
 
For authors
 
Other
 
Our sites
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.