Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Smirnova, G. E. Comparative Analysis in Socio-Cultural Area Studies

Abstract: As a method of research, comparative analysis is widely and efficiently used in all humanitarian and natural law sciences. Socio-cultural area studies is not an exception, either, because this method allows not only to definer regular patterns and particular features of a developing region but also to trace back how the same socio-cultural factors or processes are transformed under the influence of the regional specifics. The article also describes the targets of comparative studies in scientific research and inter-disciplinary grounds for socio-cultural area studies, defines the main principles and stages of comparative analysis in area studies and research. A good example of a comparative analysis method in socio-cultural area studies is the comparison of terms ‘homeland’ in Russian and English cultures of XVIII. This term takes the first place in any nation or mentality and it is one of the most important instruments of self-identification. Without reconstruction of the meaning, content and evolution of the term ‘homeland’ it would be impossible to describe the history of culture and mentality of any nation.


Keywords:

cultural studies, area studies, socio-cultural area studies, socio-cultural research, research methods, interdisciplinary, comparative analysis, comparative studies, methodology, teaching.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Burlak S.A., Starostin S.A. Vvedenie v lingvisticheskuyu komparativistiku. M., 2001.
2. Golosov G.V. Sravnitel'naya politologiya. SPb, 2001.
3. Elistratov V.S. Regionovedenie. Ishchite termin // Aktual'nye problemy regionovedeniya. Vyp. I. M., 2004.
4. Zhirmunskiy V.M. Srednevekovaya literatura kak predmet sravnitel'nogo literaturovedeniya // Izvestiya AN SSSR. Otdelenie literatury i yazyka. M., 1971. T. XXX. Vyp. 3. S. 185-197.
5. Ivanova M.V., Shtan'ko M.A. Vvedenie v regionovedenie. Metody regionovedcheskikh issledovaniy. Tomsk, 2007.
6. Koval'chenko I.D. Metody istoricheskikh issledovaniy. M., 1987.
7. Koval'chenko I.D., Tishkov V.A. Itogi i perspektivy primeneniya kolichestvennykh metodov v so-vetskoy i amerikanskoy istoriografii // Kolichestvennye metody v sovetskoy i amerikanskoy istoriografii. M., 1983.
8. Neupokoeva I.G. Problemy vzaimodeystviya sovremennykh literatur. M., 1963.
9. Pavlovskaya A.V. Spetsial'nost' «regionovedenie» na fakul'tete inostrannykh yazykov i regiono-vedeniya MGU im. M.V Lomonosova: itogi i perspektivy // Aktual'nye voprosy regionovedeniya. Vyp. II. M., 2007.
10. Pivovar E.I. Teoreticheskie problemy istoricheskikh issledovaniy. Vyp. 4. M., 2002.
11. Regin Ch. Osobennosti komparativistiki // Sovremennaya sravnitel'naya politologiya. M., 1997.
12. Selunskaya N.B. Problemy metodologii istorii. M., 2003.
13. Smirnova G.E. Ponyatie «otechestvo» v angliyskoy i russkoy kul'turakh XVIII veka: diss. na soisk. uch. st. ... kand. kul'turologii. M., 2003.
14. Holt R., Turner J. The methodology of comparative research. N.Y., 1970.
15. Przeworski A., Teune N. The logic of comparative social inquiry. N.Y., 1970