
	Philosophy and Culture Reference: Fetisova, E. E. Neo-Acmeism as a ‘Cultural Paradigm’ of XX Century (Cultural Memory, Esthetic Platform, Literary Groups, Transformation of ‘Semantic Poetics’) // Philosophy and Culture. 2013. № 2. P. 210-218. URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62331 Fetisova, E. E. Neo-Acmeism as a ‘Cultural Paradigm’ of XX Century (Cultural Memory, Esthetic Platform, Literary Groups, Transformation of ‘Semantic Poetics’) Abstract: The article illustrates particular features of Neo-Acmeism in terms of intra-text communication with Neo- Classicism and Acmeism. The author gives a classification of the main trends in Neo-Acmeism including non-traditional and alternative ones. The author also analyzes the foundation, conception, poetics of Post-Realism and Neo-Classicism. The author defines the three trends of ‘semantic poetics’ and analyzes the variety of ides, styles and tendencies that create the prospect of new discoveries on the paths of Russian and word literature. Keywords: cultural studies, semantic poetics, literary schools, paradigm, Neo-Classicism, Neo-Acmeism, Neo-Traditionalism, Post-Realism, trends in literature, communication. This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References 1. Gasparov M.L. Poet i kul'tura. Tri poetiki Osipa Mandel'shtama // Mandel'shtam O.E. Polnoe sobranie stikhotvoreniy: v 2 t. T. 2. SPb, 1995. 2. Gacheva A.G. Semenova S.G. Russkaya literatura 1920-1930-kh godov. Portrety poetov: v 2 t. T. 2. / red.-sost. A.G. Gacheva, S.G. Semenova. M.: IMLI RAN, 2008. 3. Ermilova E.V. Akmeizm // Russkaya literatura rubezha vekov (1890-e — nachalo 1920-kh godov). v 2 kn. Kn. 2. M.: Respeks, 2001. 4. Kolobaeva L.A. Russkiy simvolizm. M.: MGU, 2000. 5. Larmin O.V. Khudozhestvennyy metod i stil'. M.: MGU, 1964. 6. Levin Yu.I., Segal D.M., Timenchik R.D., Toporov V.N., Tsiv'yan T.V. Russkaya semanticheskaya kul'turnaya paradigma // Russian Literature (Hague). 1974. № 7-8. 7. Leyderman N.L., Lipovetskiy M. N. Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: 1950-1990-e gody: v 2 t. T. 2. 1968-1990 / N.L. Leyderman, M.N. Lipovetskiy. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M.: Akademiya, 2006. 8. Lekmanov O.A. Akmeisty // Kritika russkogo postsimvolizma / Sost., vstup. st., preambuly i pri-mech. O.A. Lekmanova. M.: Olimp: AST, 2002. 9. Meshcheryakov V.P., Kozlov A.S., Kubareva N.P., Serbul M.N. Osnovy literaturovedeniya. Uchebnoe po-sobie / V.P. Meshcheryakov, A.S. Kozlov, N.P. Kubareva, M.N. Serbul; Pod obshch. red. V.P. Meshcheryakova. M.: Moskovskiy Litsey, 2000. 10. Timenchik R.D. Tekst v tekste u akmeistov // Tr. po znakovym sistemam. KhIV. Tartu, 1981. 11. Khalizev V.E. Modernizm // Teoriya literatury. M.: MGU, 2000

Journals

Books

Fetisova, E. E. Neo-Acmeism as a ‘Cultural Paradigm’ of XX Century (Cultural Memory, Esthetic Platform, Literary Groups, Transformation of ‘Semantic Poetics’)