|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law
Reference:
L.D. Ebralidze
Recognition of Affiliated Shareholder
with Respect to Joint Stock Company Law
in Russia and USA
// Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law.
2012. ¹ 6.
P. 200-204.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62031
L.D. Ebralidze Recognition of Affiliated Shareholder with Respect to Joint Stock Company Law in Russia and USAAbstract: Imperfection of the Russian legal rules on affiliates significantly reduces the investment attractiveness of Russian companies, and, consequently, adversely affects the economic situation in the country as a whole. Criteria for recognition of affiliated shareholder in Russian and US legal systems have been investigated in the article. Based on thorough analysis of the US legislation and court rulings, the author makes suggestions on Russian legislation development. Keywords: comparative law, affiliate, affiliation, shareholder, control, society, responsibilities, United States, court, fiduciary.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Zakon RSFSR ot 22.03.1991 ¹ 948-1 «O konkurentsii i ogranichenii monopolisticheskoy deyatel'nosti na to-varnykh rynkakh» (red. ot 26.07.2006) // Vedomosti SND i VS RSFSR. ¹ 16. 18.04.1991. st. 499.
2. Proekt Federal'nogo zakona ¹ 47538-6 «O vnesenii izmeneniy v chasti pervuyu, vtoruyu, tret'yu i chet-vertuyu Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii, a takzhe v otdel'nye zakonodatel'nye akty Rossiy-skoy Federatsii» (prinyat GD FS RF v pervom chtenii 27.04.2012).// http://base.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online. cgi?req=doc;base=LAW;n=128204. 3. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma VAS ¹ 14613/11 ot 22 marta 2012 g.// htpp://www.arbitr.ru. 4. Varlamova A.N. Konkurentnoe pravo Rossii. M.: Zertsalo-M, 2008. S. 259. 5. Shitkina I.S. Pravovoe regulirovanie ekonomicheskoy zavisimosti // Khozyaystvo i pravo. 2010. ¹ 8. 6. American Law Institute, Principles of Corporate Governance §1.10(a) (1994). 7. Allen & Kraakman & Subramanian, Commentaries and Cases on the Law of Business Organization, second edition p. 306. 8. Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 815 (Del. 1984) (citing Mayer v. Adams, Del.Ch., 167 A.2d 729, 732, aff’d, Del. Supr., 174 A.2d 313 (1961)). 9. Gilbert v. El Paso Co., 490 A.2d 1050 at 1055-1056. 10. Craig W. Palm & Mark A. Kearney, A Primer on the Basics of Directors’ Duties in Delaware: the Rules of the Game (Part I), 40 VILL. L. REV. 1297, 1328-1329 (2008). 11. Iman Anabtawi & Lynn Stout, Fiduciary Duties for Activist Shareholders, 60 STAN.L.REV. 1255, 1269 (2008). 12. Ivanhoe Partners, 535 A.2d 1334, 1344 (Del. 1987) (citing Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946, 958 (Del. 1985); Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 815 (Del. 1984). 13. Mary Siegel, The Erosion of the Law of Controlling Shareholders, 24 DEL.J.CORP.L. 27, 32 (1999). 14. Michael A. Rosenhouse, Majority’s Fiduciary Obligation to Minority Shareholder of Close Corporation — Breach and Remedy, 39 A.L.R.6th 1 (2008). 15. Official Comment to § 8.60 (2) of the MBCA. 16. Donald C. Langevoort, Insider Trading Regulation, Enforcement and Prevention §3:4 (2009). 17. 2011 WL 303207 (Del.Ch. 2011). 18. 284 A.2d 119, 123 (Del.Ch. 1971). 19. 836 A.2d 531, 552 (Del. 2003). 20. 493 A.2d 929 (Del. 1985). 21. 279 F.Supp. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 1967) |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
