|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Eisold, K.
Freud as a Leader: The Early Years of Viennese Society (Translated by Krotovskaya, N. G.)
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2012. ¹ 9.
P. 116-129.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=61527
Eisold, K. Freud as a Leader: The Early Years of Viennese Society (Translated by Krotovskaya, N. G.)Abstract: The study of Freud’s role as a leader of Vienesse Group has allowed to define constant tension between Freud with his intention to use the group for the development of his ideas and the group members with their desire to realize their professional ambitions and remain loyal to Feud at the same time. Freud and his followers undeliberately came to an agreement that all innternal enemies must be eliminated, i.e. Freud’s followers who questioned his theory of child sexuality and could support ‘external’ enemies of psychoanalysis. As a result, Vienesse Society continued to play a dependent role and Freud had to undertake the role of a president of the Society in order to define the ‘internal’ enemies of psychoanalysis. It was a trap made by Vienesse Society for Freud. In return Freud received loyalty of all members of the group. At the same time, the Society had to refuse from some really brilliant ideas trying to keep their relationship with Freud and not to create a new enemy inside the society. Keywords: psychology, psychoanalysis, leader, group, basic allowances, struggle, dependence, validity, enemies, institutions.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here . References
1. Abraham H. C. & Freud E. L. (eds.) A Psycho-Analitic Dialogue: The Letters of Sigmund Freud and Karl Abraham. 1907-1926. N.Y., 1966.
2. Anzieu D. The Group and the Unconscious. L., 1984.
3. Binswanger L. Sigmund Freud: Reminiscences of Friendship. N.Y., 1957.
4. Bion W. Experience in Groups. N. Y., 1969.
5. Deunsch H. Freud and his Pupils. “Psychoanal. Q.”, ¹9, rr. 184-194.
6. Eisold K. The Intolerance of Diversity in Psychoanalytic Institutes. “Int. J. Psychoanal.”, ¹ 75, pp. 785-800.
7. Ferenczi S. On the Organization of the Psycho-analytic Movement. In: Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psychoanalysis. N.Y., 1955.
8. Freud S. The Interpretation of Dreams, 1900.
9. Totem and Taboo, 1913.
10. On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement, 1914.
11. Gay P. The Life for Our Time. N.Y., 1988.
12. Jones E. The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud. L., 1953, 1955, 1957.
13. Kernberg O. F. Regression in Groups. In: Internal World and External Reality. N.Y., 1980.
14. McGuire W. The Freud/Jung Letters. Cambridge, 1974.
15. Nunberg H. & Federn E. Minutes of the Vienna Psychological Society. N.Y., 1962.
16. Puner H.W. Sigmund Freud: His Life and Mind. N.Y., 1947.
17. Sachs H. Freud: Master and Friend. Cambridge, 1945.
18. Stekel W. The Autobiography of W. Stekel. N.Y., 1950.
19. Stepansky P.E. In Freud’s Shadow. Hillsdale, 1983.
20. Wittels F. Sigmund Freud: His Personality, His Teaching, and His School. N.Y., 1924.
21. Zaleznik A. The Managerial Mystique. N.Y., 1989.
22. Zweig S. Portrait of Freud. Detroit, 1973
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
