Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Karpov, O. A. Epistemic Item and its Artifacts

Abstract: When studying the nature of social action it is becoming important to define universal epistemic constructs and symbolic mechanisms of their functioning, the latter is being behind the cognitive act including its psychocultural elements. The given article studies genesis of epistemic item as a system of cultural practices addressed to a particular issue. Its artifacts, i.e. epistemic collection and cultural implant, form universal epistemic constructs which serve as a matrix for any cognitive activity. They can also transfer knowledge through psychocultural element of cognitive act at a macro-social level. As for the epistemic item itself, it draws upon a functioning dispositive which is a form of institutionalization of cultural practices and the basis of their legitimacy and a generator of epistemic activity all in one. The start of epistemic genesis is defined through its epistemic function which is, being collective psychic force, enters the central zone of culture. The research is based in cultural and historical material and socio-cultural models of modern humanitarian studies.


Keywords:

psychology, social cognition, psychocultural semiosis, archetype, epistemic function, dispositive, epistemic item, epistemic collection, cultural implant, dogmat.


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Adorno T.V. Problemy filosofii morali / Per. s nem. M.L. Khor'kova M.: Respublika, 2000. 239 s.
2. Aristotel'. O dushe // Aristotel'. Sochineniya v chetyrekh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1976. S. 369-448.
3. Benvill Dzh. Kepler / Per. s angl. E. Surits. M.: Tekst, 2008. 285 s.
4. Bodriyyar Zh. Sistema veshchey / Per. s frants. S.N. Zenkina. M.: Rudomino, 1995. 174 s.
5. Burdakh K. Reformatsiya. Renessans. Gumanizm / Per. s nem. M.I. Levinoy. M.: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya en-tsiklopediya (ROSSPEN), 2004. 208 s.
6. Burd'e P. Prakticheskiy smysl. SPb: Aleteyya, 2001. 562 s.
7. Bekon F. Velikoe Vosstanovlenie Nauk. Predislovie // Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1977. S. 60-68.
8. Bekon F. O dostoinstve i priumnozhenii nauk // Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1977. S. 81-522.
9. Bekon F. O nachalakh i istokakh // Bekon F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 2. M.: Mysl', 1978. S. 301-347.
10. Veysman A.D. Grechesko-russkiy slovar'. Reprint V-ogo izdaniya 1899 g. M.: Izd-vo Greko-latinskiy kabinet Yu.A. Shichalina, 2006. 1371 s.
11. Galiley G. Dialog o dvukh glavneyshikh sistemakh mira — ptolomeevoy i kopernikovoy / Per. s ital. A.I. Dolgova. M., L.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo tekhniko-teoreticheskoy literatury, 1948. 380 s.
12. Gurev G.A. Sistemy mira. Ot drevneyshikh vremen do nashikh dney. M.: Moskovskiy rabochiy, 1950. 396 s.
13. Danneman F. Istoriya estestvoznaniya. Estestvennye nauki v ikh razvitii i vzaimodeystvii. Tom 1. Ot za-chatkov nauki do epokhi Vozrozhdeniya. M.: Gosudarstvennoe meditsinskoe izdatel'stvo, 1932. 432 s.
14. Dvoretskiy I.Kh. Latinsko-russkiy slovar'. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1976. 1096 s.
15. Kun T.S. Struktura nauchnykh revolyutsiy / Per. s angl. I.Z. Naletova. M.: Progress, 1977. 300 s.
16. Lakatos I. Fal'sifikatsiya i metodologiya nauchno-issledovatel'skikh programm / Per. s angl. V.N. Porus // Lakatos I. Metodologiya issledovatel'skikh programm. M.: AST; Ermak, 2003. S. 5-253.
17. Lakatos I. Istoriya nauki i ee ratsional'nye rekonstruktsii / Per. s angl. A.L. Nikiforova // Lakatos I. Metodologiya issledovatel'skikh programm. M.: AST; Ermak, 2003. S. 255-344.
18. Le Goff Zh. Drugoe Srednevekov'e: vremya, trud i kul'tura Zapada / Per. s frants. S.V. Chistyakova i N.V. Shevchenko. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2002. 328 s.
19. Lur'e S.V. Istoricheskaya etnologiya. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt; Gaudeamus, 2004. 624 s.
20. Pauli V. Vliyanie arkhetipicheskikh predstavleniy na formirovanie estestvennonauchnykh teoriy u Keplera // Pauli V. Fizicheskie ocherki: Sbornik statey. M.: Nauka, 1975. S. 137-175.
21. Polani M. Lichnostnoe znanie. Na puti k postkriticheskoy filosofii. Blagoveshchensk: Izdanie Blagove-shchenskogo gumanitarnogo kolledzha im. I.A. Boduena de Kurtene, 1998. 344 s.
22. Popper K.R. Ob'ektivnoe znanie. Evolyutsionnyy podkhod / Per. s angl. D.G. Lakhuti. M.: Editorial URSS, 2002. 384 s.
23. Raynberger Kh.-Y. Chastitsy v tsitoplazme: puti i sud'by odnogo nauchnogo ob'ekta / Per. s nem. K. A. Levin-sona // Nauka i nauchnost' v istoricheskoy perspektive. SPb: Evropeyskiy universitet v Sankt-Peterburge; Aleteyya, 2007. S. 284-316.
24. Rozhanskiy I.D. Razvitie estestvoznaniya v epokhu antichnosti. Rannyaya grecheskaya nauka o «prirode». M.: Nauka, 1979. 486 s.
25. Styuart K. Pozornaya shuba, ili neprednamerennye effekty sotsial'nogo distsiplinirovaniya / Per. s angl. K.A. Levinsona // Istoriya i antropologiya: mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov. SPb: Evropeyskiy universitet v Sankt-Peterburge; Aleteyya, 2006. S. 225-264.
26. Sebian D.U. Prichastie i obshchina: Otkaz ot poseshcheniya evkharistii v XVI veke // Istoriya i antropologiya: mezhdistsiplinarnye issledovaniya na rubezhe XX-XXI vekov. SPb: Aleteyya, 2006. S. 191-224.
27. Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb.: A-cad, 1994. 408 s.
28. Khaydegger M. Chto zovetsya myshleniem? / Per. s nem. E. Sagetdinova. M.: Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2007. 351 s.
29. Yung K.G. Ocherki o sovremennykh sobytiyakh // Yung K.G. Bozhestvennyy rebenok: analiticheskaya psikhologiya i vospitanie. M.: Olimp; AST-LTD, 1997. S. 60-176.
30. Barker P., Goldstein B.R. Theological Foundations of Kepler’s Astronomy // Science in Theistic Con-texts. Chicago: Osiris, Vol. 16, 2001. P. 88-113.
31. Kepler J. Ad Vitellionem Paralipomena. Frankfurt, 1604.
32. Kepler J. Prodromus dissertationem cosmographicum continens Mysterium cosmographicum. 1596.
33. Kepler J. Tertius interveniens. 1610