Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Politics and Society
Reference:

Kuznetsov, I. V. Russia Needs a Patent Court

Abstract: The article is devoted to the problem of improvement of mechanisms of protecting intellectual property. The author of the article describes the theoretical and legal grounds for the need and possibility of creation a specialized patent court as the key element in forming an effective system of protection of intellectual activity. The other element of this system is the pre-trial mechanism of protection of intellectual property. Special attention is paid at the prerequisites of legal and economic nature as well as the study of foreign experience and its projection of the Russian legal reality.


Keywords:

studies of law, law, court, patent, intellectual, property, protection, reformation, pre-trial, mechanism.


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Ershova E.A. Spetsializirovannyy sud po rassmotreniyu trudovykh sporov i Trudovoy protsessual'nyy
2. kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: za i protiv // Rossiyskoe pravosudie. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal. ¹2
3. (10) // 2007 s. 61-68
4. Ivanov A.A.Arbitrazhnye sudy: puti razvitiya» // Federal'naya pravovaya gazeta «ezh-YuRIST», ¹23 (528)
5. 2008 g.
6. Izotov N.N. O sootnoshenii “zashchity” i “okhrany” intellektual'noy sobstvennosti // Yuridicheskiy
7. mir. - 2006. - ¹10
8. Informatsionnoe pis'ma Prezidiuma VAS RF N 19 ot 29.07.97 «Obzor praktiki razresheniya sporov,
9. svyazannykh s zashchitoy prav na tovarnyy znak», p.9.
10. Informatsionnoe pis'ma Prezidiuma VAS RF N 19 ot 29.07.97 «Obzor praktiki razresheniya sporov,
11. svyazannykh s zashchitoy prav na tovarnyy znak», p.9.
12. Kashkin Sergey Yur'evich, Kalinichenko P.A., Chetverikov A.O. Vvedenie v pravo Evropeyskogo Soyuza.
13. Uchebnik. 3-e izdanie, pererab. i dop.// Eksmo // M. 2010
14. Kozak D.. Sud v sovremennom mire: problemy i perspektivy // Rossiyskaya yustitsiya. - 2001, ¹9.
15. Kozyrina A.N., Shtanina M.A. Administrativnoe pravo zarubezhnykh stran. - M.: Spartak, 2003.
16. - S. 98-100.
17. Kulikov V. Sud idet. Dvazhdy // Rossiyskaya gazeta – Federal'nyy vypusk ¹5405(29) 11.02.2011
18. Nikerov G.I. Sudebnaya vlast' v pravovom gosudarstve (opyt sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya) // Gosudarstvo
19. i pravo. - M.: Nauka, 2001, ¹3. - S. - S. 17.
20. Nikerov G.I. Sudebnaya vlast' v pravovom gosudarstve (opyt sravnitel'nogo issledovaniya) // Gosudarstvo
21. i pravo. - M.: Nauka, 2001, ¹3. - S. - S. 17.
22. Nikolaev M. A V Germanii patentnyy sud est'! // Intellekt. sobstvennost'. - 1995. - N 5-6. - S.39-40
23. Sergeev A.P. Pravo intellektual'noy sobstvennosti v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Uchebnik. 2-e izd., pere-
24. rab. i dop. – M.: TK Velbi, Izd-vo Prospekt, 2004
25. Tikhomirova L.V., Tikhomirov M.Yu. Yuridicheskaya entsiklopediya. Izd. 5-e. Dopolnennoe i pererabotan-
26. noe. / Pod red. M.Yu.Tikhomirova. – M.: 2001. - S. 431.
27. Khalipova Elena Vyacheslavovna Intellektual'naya sobstvennost'. Konstitutsionno-pravovye osnovy /
28. M.: Patent, 1998. - 304 s. - 45-00.