|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:
Spirova, E. M.
Kula and Potlatch: Psychological Meaning (Sign, Symbol and Simulacrum in Jean Baudrillard’s
Interpretation)
// Psychology and Psychotechnics.
2011. ¹ 5.
P. 48-56.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58328
Spirova, E. M. Kula and Potlatch: Psychological Meaning (Sign, Symbol and Simulacrum in Jean Baudrillard’s Interpretation)Abstract: French philosopher Jean Baudrillard pays signification attention at differentiation of the terms ‘sign’, ‘symbol’ and ‘simulacrum’. The attribute which allows to differentiate these terms is their relation to objectivity. According to the author, a sign is always objective and refers to objectivity. Symbol is objective but does not refer to objectivity. Simulacrum tears apart the connection between a sign and objectivity. Keywords: philosophy, psychology, sign, objectivity, symbol, simulacrum, ideology, sociality, message, exchange.
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Bodriyyar Zh. K kritike politicheskoy ekonomii znaka. M., 2007.
2. Bodriyyar Zh. Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert'. M., 2006. 3. Zenkin S.N. Zhan Bodriyyar: vremya simulyakrov // Bodriyyar Zh. Simvolicheskiy obmen i smert'. M., 2006. S. 7-8. 4. Ivanyuk I. Kula i potlach // Literaturnaya gazeta. 2011. ¹ 22. S. 2. 5. Kutyrev V.A. Bytie ili nichto. SPb., 2010. 6. Yung K.G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. SPb., 1995. 7. Yung K.G. Simvoly transformatsii. M., 2000. 8. Damon F.H. The Kula and Generalised Exchange: Considering some Unconsidered Aspects of the Elementary Structures of Kinship // Man (new series). 1980. ¹ 15. S. 280 |
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
