Ðóñ Eng Cn Translate this page:
Please select your language to translate the article


You can just close the window to don't translate
Library
Your profile

Back to contents

Philosophy and Culture
Reference:

Davydov, V. A. The Process of the History Reconstruction (Peculiarities of Infl uence of Culture and Society).

Abstract: The article considers some aspects of the process of infl uence of ideology, social cultural values, standards of ethics and esthetics and etc. on the process of history reconstruction. It is noted that ideology infl uence is one of the most strongly marked and the most distorting the entire process and outcomes of the history reconstruction. The author insists on the thesis that the implicit form of basic cultural values and social norms is refl ected in reconstructive ‘historical knowledge’. Moreover, when the former changes, it makes the historical knowledge to change, too. As a result, any society would inevitably have its own history based on the values and norms generally accepted in this society. The author of the article also raises a question about moral and ethical responsibility of a historian for results of such reconstruction.


Keywords:

philosophy, history reconstruction, historical knowledge, culture, axiological approach, objectivity, values, morals, ethics, esthetics


This article is unavailable for unregistered users. Click to login or register

References
1. Antipov G. A. Prisushche li nauke nravstvennoe nachalo? // Nauka i tsennosti. Novosibirsk, 1987.
2. – S. 50.
3. Buller A. O predmete i metode teorii istoricheskogo poznaniya // Logos, 2001. ¹5-6. URL: http://
4. www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashcheniya: 23.10.2008).
5. Buller A. Ukaz. soch. URL: http://www.ruthenia.ru/logos/number/2001_5_6/12.htm (data obrashche-
6. niya: 23.10.2008).
7. Gobozov I. A. Vvedenie v filosofiyu istorii. M., 1999.
8. Gurevich A. Ya. Dvoyakaya otvetstvennost' istorika // Problemy istoricheskogo poznaniya.
9. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii. Moskva, 19-21 maya 1996 g. M., 1999. – S. 11-12.
10. Doroshenko N. M. Edinstvo nauchnogo i vnenauchnogo v istoricheskom poznanii // Nauchnye i vne-
11. nauchnye formy v sotsial'nom poznanii. M., 1985. – S. 165-166.
12. Krauze G. Razvitie ponimaniya istorii do Karla Marksa. SPb, 1906.
13. Loseva O. A. Aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya. Saratov, 2000.
14. Loseva O. A. Metodologicheskie i aksiologicheskie determinatsii istoricheskogo poznaniya.
15. Saratov, 2004.
16. Mikeshina L. A. Epistemologiya tsennostey. M., 2007.
17. Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A. V. Znanie o proshlom: teoriya i istoriya. V 2-kh tt. T. 1. SPb, 2003.
18. Timofeeva O. G. Tsennosti kul'tury: sotsiologicheskiy aspekt // Problema tsennostey v gumani-
19. tarnykh distsiplinakh. M., 2009. – S. 107-108.
20. Beard Ch. A. An Economis Interpretation of Constitution of the United States. New York, 1913.