|
Library
|
Your profile |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|
Philosophy and Culture
Reference:
M.A. Dryuk
Another way of philosophical impressionism or “myth” of the Modern Prometheus
// Philosophy and Culture.
2010. ¹ 5.
P. 58-64.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=57372
M.A. Dryuk Another way of philosophical impressionism or “myth” of the Modern PrometheusAbstract: This article discusses the initial basis for the decision of extremely relevant nowadays problems of human survival in the conditions of global socio-ecological crisis. Moreover, it focuses on one of the most “strong” trends related to the accusation of Science in all “Capital Sins” of the descendants of Adam. It seems Science is a kind of Ivan Susanin of our time, Frankenstein of XX-th century. The paper shows the failure of the described position, which is perceived by the author as a modern variant of philosophical impressionism. No excess of reason, but his lack, deficit, real human misunderstanding is at the origin of many evils of Western European culture. Keywords: philosophy, philosophical impressionism, apparent associations, socio-ecological crisis, the Modern Prometheus, Research technocratism, worldview attitudes, criminal misunderstanding, the concept of “Fusis” and “Nature”, the global evolutionism
This article is unavailable for unregistered users.
Click to login or register
References
1. Gurevich P.S. Filosofiya: uchebnik dlya studentov vuzov / P.S. Gurevich. M.: YuNITI-DANA, 2005. S. 20.
2. Dryuk M.A. Sinergetika: pozitivnoe znanie i filosofskiy impressionizm // Voprosy filosofii. 2004. ¹ 10. S. 102-113.
3. Dryuk M.A. Filosofskoe osmyslenie nekotorykh estestvennonauchnykh dannykh o sushchnosti zhivoy materii i cheloveka // Filosofskie issledovaniya. M.: Mosk. filosof. fond, 1998. ¹1. S.28-40.
4. Dryuk M.A. Khimicheskaya teoriya rezonansa i problemy formirovaniya filosofskoy ratsional'nosti novogo tipa: Monografiya. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2003. S. 153.
5. Dryuk M.A., Stanis E.V. Antropotsentrizm i sotsioekologicheskiy krizis. Tezisy VIII-y ezhegodnoy konferentsii kafedry filosofii RAN. M., 1995. S. 200-201.
6. Lugovskoy V.M. Supermozg populyatsii i perspektivy chelovechestva — Ierusalim: Health and Healing Ltd. (Publisher), 2005. 32 s.
7. Maneev A.K. Gipoteza o biopolevoy formatsii kak substrate zhizni i psikhiki cheloveka // Russkiy kosmizm. M.: Pedagogika-Press, 1993. S. 365.
8. Motroshilova N.V. Georg Vil'gel'm Gegel' // Istoriya filosofii: Zapad — Rossiya — Vostok (kniga vtoraya: Filosofiya XV-XIX vv.). M.: «Greko-latinskiy kabinet» Yu.A. Shichalina, 1996.
9. Reale Dzh., Antiseri D. Zapadnaya filosofiya ot istokov do nashikh dney. I. Antichnost'. — TOO TK «Petropolis», 1994. 336 s. S. 66.
10. Rotterdamskiy Erazm. Pokhvala gluposti // Biblioteka vsemirnoy literatury. T. 733. M., 1971. S. 137.
11. Stepin V.S. Dukhovnaya revolyutsiya antichnosti. Filosofiya i nauka // Stepin V.S., Gorokhov V.G., Rozov M.A. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. M.: Gardariki, 1996.
12. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya nauki. Obshchie problemy: uchebnik dlya aspirantov i soiskateley uchenoy stepeni kandidata nauk / V.S. Stepin. M.: Gardariki, 2006. S. 111-112.
13. Stepin V.S. Filosofiya nauki. Obshchie problemy: uchebnik dlya aspirantov i soiskateley uchenoy stepeni kandidata nauk / V.S. Stepin. M.: Gardariki, 2006. S. 346-347.
14. Sheler M. Filosofskoe mirovozzrenie // Sheler M. Izbr. proizv. M., 1994. S. 3.
|
© 1998 – 2024 Nota Bene. Publishing Technologies. NB-Media Ltd.
Eng
