Abstract: The legislation at large permits filing appeals against action, or inaction by the registration bodies: the refusal of state registration of property rights and property transactions, avoiding, or stalling the said registration. However, nothing is said about appeals against already performed state registration acts and supporting documentation. This issue, combined with an incorrect approach to understanding the nature of state registration of property rights lowers the efficiency of judicial protection in disputing of registered rights. The analysis conducted in this article permits to reach a conclusion that the issues of appeals against action and inaction of registration bodies is solvable within general means of legal defense. It is well-known that the interested party is free to choose a particular method of defense that is needs to be used in their particular scenario, taking into account its Civil Law characteristic. In the event that such a dispute arises, the court is not in authority to reach a decision on validity or invalidity of the property rights registration act before the dispute is solved, because this may affect the rights and interests of a third party. At the same time, court protection may be employed with the procedure of submitting a claim for the invalidation of a federal organ’s property registration act on the grounds of legal deviance. In this case, the claim for invalidation may be submitted in cases when there is no property rights dispute, and the registered right needs to be invalidated due to factual errors on behalf of the registration body, and in similar cases. Thus, this clearly is a dispute emanating from public – not private legal relations.

Keywords: appeal, state registration, act, problems, transactions, real estate, Universal state registry, Registration Act, registration certificate, legal protection

References:
Postanovleniya FAS Moskovskogo okruga ot 11 avg. 2008 g. ¹ KG-A41/5980-08 i ot 30 sent. 2008 g. ¹ KG-A41/8105-08 // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy «Konsul'tantPlyus»
Chubarov V. V. Voprosy gosudarstvennoy registratsii prav na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo i sdelok s nim // Problemy sovremennogo grazhdanskogo prava : Sb. statey. M., 2000.
Yakovleva A. Spory o gosudarstvennoy registratsii prav na nedvizhimost' // Zakonodatel'stvo.-2005.-¹ 1.
Spitsina N. V. Sudebnoe osparivanie resheniy, deystviy (bezdeystviya) nenormativnykh pravovykh ak-tov Federal'noy registratsionnoy sluzhby po delam, svyazannym s gosudarstvennoy registratsiey prav na nedvi-zhimoe imushchestvo i sdelok s nim : avtoref. diss... kand. yur. nauk. M., 2006.
Plotnikova I. N. Institut gosudarstvennoy registratsii prav na nedvizhimoe imushchestvo i sdelok s nim v sisteme zashchity prav sobstvennosti grazhdan i yuridicheskikh lits // Gosudarstvennaya registratsiya prav na nedvizhimost' : teoriya i praktika. M., 2005.
Kyurshunova N.

Abstract: To ensure the preservation of cultural heritage objects in their historical environment, Russian law enables for the territories which surround such objects to be given special land use status, which denies construction and business operations. To establish the boundaries of such areas, cultural heritage object zoning projects are being drafted. Analyzing several of such projects, made in recent years, shows that they don’t pay enough attention to provide justification for the limitations that they impose. It often happens that the establishment of such areas is not done in order to preserve a certain object of cultural heritage, but rather for the sake of a “general” preservation of a historical environment. The preservation of valuable fragments of urban environment, and not separate objects would be a favorable thing, of not for the doubts in the sincerity of the legal mechanisms employed. Establishment of land use boundaries limits the rights of owners of land and capital construction objects. This would mean that the very decision in favor of establishing cultural heritage preservation zones can be brought to the court. And in this situation, justification for the placing of legal protection on an area is very important, as well as a defined connection of the exact object of protection and the area surrounding it, for the purpose of land use. The Objects of Cultural Heritage Act #73 of 2002 defines the “object of protection” for the first time in legal practice – the description of the special properties of the object which would justify listing it as cultural heritage and vesting it with legal protection. This, the justification of limiting the use of areas, may only be used in light of the necessity for the preservation of objects of cultural heritage. This particular point, regretfully, is often overlooked when cultural heritage preservation plans are being drafted.

Keywords: urban planning, urban management, heritage, protection areas, historical construction, principles of regulation, protection, law, limitations, procedure

References:
Obosnovyvayushchie materialy. Kniga
Svedeniya ob ob'ektakh kul'turnogo naslediya (krome pamyatnikov arkheologii). Perm', 2011. S. 199. Proekt zon okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya, raspolozhennykh na territorii g. Permi. Poyasnitel'naya zapiska. Tom 2. Granitsy zon okhrany i gradostroitel'nye reglamenty (utverzhdaemaya chast'). Kniga 2. Zony okhrany (svodnaya tablitsa). Perm', 2011. S. 163-164. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po opredeleniyu predmeta okhrany ob'ektov kul'turnogo naslediya. – M., OOO «PF-Grado», 2011. Prutsyn O.I. Restavratsiya i rekonstruktsiya arkhitekturnogo naslediya. Teoreticheskie i metodicheskie osnovy restavratsiy istoricheskogo i arkhitekturnogo naslediya. – M.: Akademiya restavratsiy, 1996. Prutsyn O.I., Romashevskiy B., Borusevich V.. Arkhitekturno-istoricheskaya sreda. – M, «Stroyizdat», 1990 Alekseev Yu.V., Somov G.Yu., Shevchenko E.A.. Gradostroitel'noe proektirovanie dostoprimechatel'nykh mest» (v 2 tomakh). – M., ASV, 2012. Lozhkin A.Yu. Ob adresatakh proektov zon okhra

Abstract: The development of market relations in Russia, which are based on property rights, has led to the necessity for drafting a new legal base for real property transactions, necessary for creating a new property and transaction registration regulation, first and foremost. With that in mind, it was necessary for the legal status of real property to be founded on firm protection of property rights, and for it to have special procedures for managing it. The article explores state registration on property rights and transactions, from the point of view of goal-setting and the priority of creating a strong system for property transactions within civil law environment. State registration of property rights and transactions is an important element of public regulation of civil law relations, and thus, holds a secondary role in relation to the civil law in this case. The goal for such regulation is to provide more stability in civil law relations.

Keywords: Legal nature, government registration, property rights, real property, expropriation, law application, proof, legal basis, emergence of rights

References:
O nekotorykh voprosakh, voznikayushchikh v sudebnoy praktike pri razreshenii sporov, svyazannykh s zashchi-toy prava sobstvennosti i drugikh veshchnykh prav : postanovlenie Plenuma Verkh. Suda Ros. Federatsii i Plenuma Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 29 apr. 2010 g. ¹ 10/22 : po sost. na 01 yanv. 2012 g. // Byulleten' Verkh. Su-da Ros. Federatsii.-2010.-¹ 7.
O nekotorykh voprosakh praktiki razresheniya sporov, svyazannykh s zashchitoy prava sobstvennosti i dru-gikh veshchnykh prav : postanovlenie Plenuma Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 25 fevr. 1998 g. ¹ 8 : utratilo silu // Vestnik Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii.-1998.-¹ 10.
Opredelenie Vyssh. Arbitr. Suda Ros. Federatsii ot 24 apr. 2009 g. ¹ 5070/09 ; Postanovlenie FAS Severo-Kavkazskogo okruga ot 17 yanv. 2011 g. po delu ¹ A53-2008/2009 ; Postanovlenie Pyatnadtsatogo arbitrazh-nogo apellyatsionnogo suda ot 31 maya 2011 g. ¹ 15AP-3649/11 // Dostup iz sprav.-pravovoy sistemy GARANT.
Alekseev V.A. Nedvizhimoe imushchestvo : gosu