Review: In the present research the motif of the road in ancient egyptian mythology and ritual practice is compared with the ideas and images of the unconscious developed within the framework of the integral personality in the analytical psychology of Carl Gustav Jung. Studying mythological conceptions of the eternal gyre of the Sun God – the supreme Creator – the author finds out that these mythological beliefs were reflected in the architecture of the motif of the road. This mythologeme also occurs in the initiation of the deceased walking along divine ways through the netherworld. Thoth – the God of knowledge and scholarship – was considered to be the guide of the dead. He could manage demons of the other world with the help of magic spells. Following these ways the soul of the deceased was brought to the divine celestial world of the eternal life. The discussed mythological beliefs are also compared with such fundamental concepts of the analytical psychology as libido, the inward man, the archetypes of what Jung has called in German – Selbst (Self), the wise man, etc. The research work is based on the comparative method in terms of scientific synthesis aplied in the area of mythological consciousness and analytical psychology. The main conclusions are the following: The mythological consciousness was based on the similarity between the material-sensual and the spiritual-psychical in the beliefs about the picture of the world and the role of man in it. The motif of the road in the ancient egyptian mythological conceptions was studied in terms of unity between the myth of the Sun God – Creator and initiation in the burial custom. In the course of research the author of the article 'built the bridge' to the philosophical-psychological idea of Carl Gustav Jung concerning the conflict of opposites and elimination of conflicts by means of what he has called Selbst in German – the symbol of uniform integrity. The main contribution to the theme is the detailed comparative historical and psychological analysis of the archetype of the road. It is for the first time in the academic literature of the comparative mythology that the deep-laid origins of the individual's motif of the road are studied on the basis of the analytical psychology founded by Carl Gustav Jung. This work can be applied in the course of lectures and in the practical work in psychotechnics.

Keywords: sun god - creator, initianion, the unconscious, Selbst, the temple-road, libido, soul, spirit, guide, inward man

References:
Iz ustnogo soobshcheniya egiptologa M. Yu. Lavrent'evoy, avtora knigi «Ramesseyskiy Dramaticheskiy papirus: perevod i kommentariy (gotovitsya k pechati).
Toporov V. N. O rituale. Vvedenie v problematiku. // Arkhaicheskiy ritual v fol'klornykh i ranneliteraturnykh pamyatnikakh. M., 1988. S.7-60.
Terner V. Simvol i ritual. M.: «Nauka», 1983.
Stayn M. Kogda polzhizni prozhito… Yungianskiy vzglyad. M.: «Nezavisimaya firma Klass», 2009. S. 118–119.
Yung K. G. Psikhologiya i alkhimiya. M. «Rafl–buk Vakler», 2003.
Frants fon M.–L. Proektsii i vozvrashchenie proektsiy v Yungianskoy psikhologii. M.: seriya «Suverennoe Yungianstvo», 2011.
Yung K. G. Dukh Merkuriya. M.: «KANON», 1996.
Frants fon M.–L. Kosmogonicheskie mify. M.: seriya «Suverennoe Yungianstvo», 2012.
Yung K. G. Kommentariy k «Tayne Zolotogo Tsvetka» // K. G. Yung. O psikhologii vostochnykh religiy i filosofiy. Sostavitel' V. Bakusev. M.: «Medium», 1994. C. 57-69.
Linch E. Kul'tura i kommunikatsiya. Logika vzaimosvyazi simvolov. M.: «Vostochnaya literatura», 2001.
Yung K. G. Psikhologicheskiy kommentariy k «Bardo Tkhodol». – K. G. Yung. O psikhologii vostochnykh religiy i filosofiy. Sostavitel' V. Bakusev. M.: «Medium», 1994. S. 26-35.
Kees G. Zaupokoynye verovaniya drevnikh egiptyan. Spb.: «Zhurnal Neva», 2005. S.462.
Turaev B. A. Bog Tot. Spb.: «Letniy sad», 2002. S. 51.
Lichtheim M. Ancient Egyptian Literature. Vol. I. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: «University of California Press», 1975.
Poeziya Drevnego Egipta // Poeziya i proza Drevnego Vostoka. M: «Khudozhestvennaya literatura», 1973.
Yung K. G. Vospominaniya, snovideniya, razmyshleniya. Minsk: «Kharvest», 2003.
Toporov V. N. Mifologiya. Stat'i dlya mifologicheskikh entsiklopediy. T. 2. M.: «Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury», 2014.
Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. Kul'tura i vzryv vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Stat'i. Issledovaniya. Zametki. Spb: «Iskusstvo – SPB», 2004.
Frans M.–L. fon. Proektsii i vozvrashenie proektsiy v yungianskoy psikhologii. M.: seriya «Suverennoe Yungianstvo», 2011.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. M.–Spb: «Universitetskaya kniga», 2002. T.2.
Faulkner R. O. A Concise Dictionary of Middle Egyptian. Lond.: «Griffith Institute Oxford», 2002.
Frants M.-L fon. Protsess individuatsii// K. G. Yung. Chelovek i ego simvoly. M.: «AST», 1998.
Yung. K. G. Struktura psikhiki i arkhetipy. M: «Akademicheskiy proekt», 2013.
Yung K. G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. Minsk.: «Kharvest», 2003.
Pinch G. Magic in Ancient Egypt. Lond.: British Museum Press, 1994.
Meeks D., Favar-Meeks K. Povsednevnaya zhizn' egipetskikh bogov. M.: «Molodaya gvardiya. PALIMPSEST», 2008.
Assman Ya. Egipet. Teologiya i blagochestie ranney tsivilizatsii. M.: «Pristsel's», 1999. V etoy knige avtor, izuchaya pis'mennye istochniki, obosnoval gipotezu «blizosti k bogu» (kak prostranstvo deystviya i smyslovoy gorizont) i ustanovil tri izmereniya: kul'tovyy, kosmicheskiy i mifologicheskiy.
Yung K.G. Ob energetike dushi. M.: «Akademicheskiy Proekt», 2008.
Yung K.G. Dusha i mif. Shest' arkhetipov. Minsk: «Kharvest».
Yung K. G. Simvoly transformatsii. M.: «AST», 2009.
Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe. M.: «Moskovskiy universitet», 1994.

References (transliteration):
Iz ustnogo soobshcheniya egiptologa M. Yu. Lavrent'evoy, avtora knigi «Ramesseyskiy Dramaticheskiy papirus: perevod i kommentariy (gotovitsya k pechati).
Toporov V. N. O rituale. Vvedenie v problematiku. // Arkhaicheskiy ritual v fol'klornykh i ranneliteraturnykh pamyatnikakh. M., 1988. S.7-60.
Terner V. Simvol i ritual. M.: «Nauka», 1983.
Stayn M. Kogda polzhizni prozhito… Yungianskiy vzglyad. M.: «Nezavisimaya firma Klass», 2009. S. 118–119.
Yung K. G. Psikhologiya i alkhimiya. M. «Rafl–buk Vakler», 2003.
Frants fon M.–L. Proektsii i vozvrashchenie proektsiy v Yungianskoy psikhologii. M.: seriya «Suverennoe Yungianstvo», 2011.
Yung K. G. Dukh Merkuriya. M.: «KANON», 1996.
Frants fon M.–L. Kosmogonicheskie mify. M.: seriya «Suverennoe Yungianstvo», 2012.
Yung K. G. Kommentariy k «Tayne Zolotogo Tsvetka» // K. G. Yung. O psikhologii vostochnykh religiy i filosofiy. Sostavitel' V. Bakusev. M.: «Medium», 1994. C. 57-69.
Linch E. Kul'tura i kommunikatsiya. Logika vzaimosvyazi simvolov. M.: «Vostochnaya literatura», 2001.
Yung K. G. Psikhologicheskiy kommentariy k «Bardo Tkhodol». – K. G. Yung. O psikhologii vostochnykh religiy i filosofiy. Sostavitel' V. Bakusev. M.: «Medium», 1994. S. 26-35.
Kees G. Zaupokoynye verovaniya drevnikh egiptyan. Spb.: «Zhurnal Neva», 2005. S.462.
Turaev B. A. Bog Tot. Spb.: «Letniy sad», 2002. S. 51.
Lichtheim M. Ancient Egyptian Literature. Vol. I. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: «University of California Press», 1975.
Poeziya Drevnego Egipta // Poeziya i proza Drevnego Vostoka. M: «Khudozhestvennaya literatura», 1973.
Yung K. G. Vospominaniya, snovideniya, razmyshleniya. Minsk: «Kharvest», 2003.
Toporov V. N. Mifologiya. Stat'i dlya mifologicheskikh entsiklopediy. T. 2. M.: «Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury», 2014.
Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera. Kul'tura i vzryv vnutri myslyashchikh mirov. Stat'i. Issledovaniya. Zametki. Spb: «Iskusstvo – SPB», 2004.
Frans M.–L. fon. Proektsii i vozvrashenie proektsiy v yungianskoy psikhologii. M.: seriya «Suverennoe Yungianstvo», 2011.
Kassirer E. Filosofiya simvolicheskikh form. M.–Spb: «Universitetskaya kniga», 2002. T.2.
Faulkner R. O. A Concise Dictionary of Middle Egyptian. Lond.: «Griffith Institute Oxford», 2002.
Frants M.-L fon. Protsess individuatsii// K. G. Yung. Chelovek i ego simvoly. M.: «AST», 1998.
Yung. K. G. Struktura psikhiki i arkhetipy. M: «Akademicheskiy proekt», 2013.
Yung K. G. Psikhologicheskie tipy. Minsk.: «Kharvest», 2003.
Pinch G. Magic in Ancient Egypt. Lond.: British Museum Press, 1994.
Meeks D., Favar-Meeks K. Povsednevnaya zhizn' egipetskikh bogov. M.: «Molodaya gvardiya. PALIMPSEST», 2008.
Assman Ya. Egipet. Teologiya i blagochestie ranney tsivilizatsii. M.: «Pristsel's», 1999. V etoy knige avtor, izuchaya pis'mennye istochniki, obosnoval gipotezu «blizosti k bogu» (kak prostranstvo deystviya i smyslovoy gorizont) i ustanovil tri izmereniya: kul'tovyy, kosmicheskiy i mifologicheskiy.
Yung K.G. Ob energetike dushi. M.: «Akademicheskiy Proekt», 2008.
Yung K.G. Dusha i mif. Shest' arkhetipov. Minsk: «Kharvest».
Yung K. G. Simvoly transformatsii. M.: «AST», 2009.
Eliade M. Svyashchennoe i mirskoe. M.: «Moskovskiy universitet», 1994.

Review: The author of the article discusses the origin of atomistic concepts from the point of view of intercultural studies. The article is devoted to researching the phenomena of Chinese culture, in particular, the Chinese verbal and written languages. The analysis is based on the cognitive approach described in I. Merkulov’s researches. Based on the examples from the Chinese verbal and written languages, the author of the article shows that Chinese people have a singular type of cogitation — mostly spatial-image (‘dextrocerebral’) thinking which is related to archaic cogitation. The author describes structures and types of hieroglyphs and demonstrates the examples of influence of hieroglyph “images’ on cultural occurrences in architecture, education, Internet communication and etc. The author also analyzes typical examples depicting the dependence of use of the words from the nature of percept images denoted by these words. The author also compares these features with the languages of modern primitive populations. Based on the examples from the Chinese language and culture the author makes a conclusion that Chinese people in general have a holistic and concrete world outlook and it is not typical for them to divide something whole into parts. This conclusion correlates with A. I. Kobzeva’s assumption that the idea of atomism was alien to Chinese people who represented the “dextrocerebral” psychological type.

Keywords: atomism, the Chinese language, the Chinese culture, spatial-image thinking, analytical thinking, hieroglyph, phonetics, written language, percept-image, thinking, cogitation.

Contact information: Rubets Maria Vladimirovna, 119991, Russia, Moscow, ul. Vokhonka 14/1, bld. 5, room 419.

References:
Alekseev M. E. Atapaskskie yazyki //Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. [Gl. red. V. N. Yartseva]. Moskva «Sovetskaya entsiklopediya» M., 1990. S.50-51.
Grube V. Kitayskiy yazyk i pis'mo // Tsivilizatsiya. Vse o Kitae. M., 2001. S. 11–22.
Doman G. Kak nauchit' rebenka chitat' ili tikhaya nezhnaya revolyutsiya.-URL: http://chitat'-onlayn.rf/index.php?id=111659&pages=2
Dukhovnaya kul'tura Kitaya: Entsiklopediya. T. 5: Nauka, tekhnicheskaya i voennaya mysl', zdravookhranenie i obrazovanie. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2009.
Kobzev A.I. Kitay i vzaimosvyazi ieroglifiki s kontinualizmom, a alfavita s atomizmom. // Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae: XLI nauchnaya konferentsiya / In-t vostokovedeniya RAN. M.: Vost. lit., 2011. S. 314-325.
Kornev A.N. Narusheniya chteniya i pis'ma u detey: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. SPb.: MiM, 1997.
Lakoff Dzh. Myshlenie v zerkale klassifikatorov // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Sost. i red.: V.V.Petrov, V.I.Gerasimov. / M.: Progress, 1988. vyp. XXIII. S. 12-51.
Merkulov I.P. Kognitivnye sposobnosti. M., 2005.
Rotenberg V.S. Mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya, ee funktsiya i ontogenez // Rukovodstvo po funktsional'noy mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii.-M: Nauchnyy mir, 2009. – URL: http://www.cerebral-asymmetry.ru/6.Rotenberg.pdf
Semenovich A.V., Tsyganok A.A. Neyropsikhologicheskiy podkhod k tipologii ontogeneza // Neyropsikhologicheskiy analiz mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii mozga.-M.: Nauka, 1986.
Simernitskaya E.G. Dominantnost' polushariy./pod red. A. R. Luriya.-M.: izd-vo MGU, 1978.
Simernitskaya E.G. Mozg cheloveka i psikhicheskie protsessy v ontogeneze.-M.:, izd-vo MGU, 1985.
Skvortsova N.N. K probleme soglasovaniya kharakteristik kul'turno-poznavatel'nogo stilya kitayskikh studentov s trebovaniyami, pred'yavlyaemymi k uchebnoy deyatel'nosti // Puti Podnebesnoy: sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. III. V 2 ch. Ch. 1/ otv. red. A.N. Gordey. Minsk: RIVSh, 2013. S. 184-188.
Sun' Chzhisyan. Russko-kitayskiy slovar' sochetaemosti slov. Pekin, 2003.
Susov I. P. Istoriya yazykoznaniya. M.: Vostok-Zapad, 2006.
Faskhutdinova Yu.F. K voprosu o razvitii kognitivnykh sposobnostey u detey s ZPR. // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 5. - C. 24 - 45. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_9135.html
Faskhutdinova Yu.F. Motivatsiya i razvitie kognitivnykh sposobnostey u shkol'nikov. // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2013. - 1. - C. 140 - 154. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_5113.html
Breskin V.Yu. Triada: Metod izucheniya sushchnosti semioticheskogo edinstva yazyka i iskusstva // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 3. - C. 119 - 159. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.3.19. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_19.html

References (transliteration):
Alekseev M. E. Atapaskskie yazyki //Lingvisticheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar'. [Gl. red. V. N. Yartseva]. Moskva «Sovetskaya entsiklopediya» M., 1990. S.50-51.
Grube V. Kitayskiy yazyk i pis'mo // Tsivilizatsiya. Vse o Kitae. M., 2001. S. 11–22.
Doman G. Kak nauchit' rebenka chitat' ili tikhaya nezhnaya revolyutsiya.-URL: http://chitat'-onlayn.rf/index.php?id=111659&pages=2
Dukhovnaya kul'tura Kitaya: Entsiklopediya. T. 5: Nauka, tekhnicheskaya i voennaya mysl', zdravookhranenie i obrazovanie. M.: Vostochnaya literatura, 2009.
Kobzev A.I. Kitay i vzaimosvyazi ieroglifiki s kontinualizmom, a alfavita s atomizmom. // Obshchestvo i gosudarstvo v Kitae: XLI nauchnaya konferentsiya / In-t vostokovedeniya RAN. M.: Vost. lit., 2011. S. 314-325.
Kornev A.N. Narusheniya chteniya i pis'ma u detey: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. SPb.: MiM, 1997.
Lakoff Dzh. Myshlenie v zerkale klassifikatorov // Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Sost. i red.: V.V.Petrov, V.I.Gerasimov. / M.: Progress, 1988. vyp. XXIII. S. 12-51.
Merkulov I.P. Kognitivnye sposobnosti. M., 2005.
Rotenberg V.S. Mezhpolusharnaya asimmetriya, ee funktsiya i ontogenez // Rukovodstvo po funktsional'noy mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii.-M: Nauchnyy mir, 2009. – URL: http://www.cerebral-asymmetry.ru/6.Rotenberg.pdf
Semenovich A.V., Tsyganok A.A. Neyropsikhologicheskiy podkhod k tipologii ontogeneza // Neyropsikhologicheskiy analiz mezhpolusharnoy asimmetrii mozga.-M.: Nauka, 1986.
Simernitskaya E.G. Dominantnost' polushariy./pod red. A. R. Luriya.-M.: izd-vo MGU, 1978.
Simernitskaya E.G. Mozg cheloveka i psikhicheskie protsessy v ontogeneze.-M.:, izd-vo MGU, 1985.
Skvortsova N.N. K probleme soglasovaniya kharakteristik kul'turno-poznavatel'nogo stilya kitayskikh studentov s trebovaniyami, pred'yavlyaemymi k uchebnoy deyatel'nosti // Puti Podnebesnoy: sb. nauch. tr. Vyp. III. V 2 ch. Ch. 1/ otv. red. A.N. Gordey. Minsk: RIVSh, 2013. S. 184-188.
Sun' Chzhisyan. Russko-kitayskiy slovar' sochetaemosti slov. Pekin, 2003.
Susov I. P. Istoriya yazykoznaniya. M.: Vostok-Zapad, 2006.
Faskhutdinova Yu.F. K voprosu o razvitii kognitivnykh sposobnostey u detey s ZPR. // NB: Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. - 2013. - 5. - C. 24 - 45. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_9135.html
Faskhutdinova Yu.F. Motivatsiya i razvitie kognitivnykh sposobnostey u shkol'nikov. // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2013. - 1. - C. 140 - 154. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_5113.html
Breskin V.Yu. Triada: Metod izucheniya sushchnosti semioticheskogo edinstva yazyka i iskusstva // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2012. - 3. - C. 119 - 159. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.3.19. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_19.html