Abstract: The article considers the issues of the influence of national and foreign corporations on the formation and implementation of Russia’s foreign economic policy during their interaction with the state. The author describes the tendencies of formation of corporations as political actors on the international scene. 
At the present time, the increase of the role and the influence of corporations in the international political system can be observed. First of all, it is connected with the growing interdependence of the international economics and politics. The economic potential of particular corporations excels those of many countries. A corporation acts both as an instrument of implementation of state interests on the foreign scene, and as an object of influence of foreign actors aiming at affecting the policy of particular countries. 
The author uses the systems approach and the methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison. The role and influence of the largest corporations of Russia on the formation and implementation of the state’s foreign economic policy of the kin-state and the recipient states is considered in terms of international political economics. The acquired results help give attention to particular aspects of interaction between the state and corporations in the context of raising the effectiveness of Russia’s foreign economic policy implementation. 
 

Keywords: international Business, economic diplomacy, foreign policy, national interests, transnational corporations, foreign economic policy, international political economy, interaction of actors, political influence, international relations

References:
Fortune Global 500. 2017. // Fortune URL: http://fortune.com/global500/list/filtered?non-us-cos-y-n=true (data obrashcheniya 01.04.2019).
Tkachenko S. L. The study of international political economy in Russia // Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 2004. Vol. 37. №. 1. P. 111-120.
Strange S. States and Markets. London: Frances Pinter, 1988. 280 p.
Keohane R. O. After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press, 2005. 281 p.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America. 2017 December // White house. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (data obrashcheniya 31.03.2019).
Goldman M. Petrostate: Putin, Power, and the New Russia. NY.: Oxford university press, 2010. 327 p.
Green D. The world’s top 100 economies: 31 countries; 69 corporations // The World Bank Group. 2016. Vol. 9.P. 20-26.
Haas E. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces. Stanford, 1958. 592 p.
Deutsch

Abstract: The subject of this research is the main trends of trade and economic cooperation between the Republic of Korea and Mongolia at the present stage. The aim of the research is to create a picture of trade and economic cooperation between Mongolia and the Republic of Korea at the present time. The author of the article describes trade and economic relations between Mongolia and the Republic of Korea, defines the role of investments of the Republic of Korea in the development of bilateral cooperation, and describes the main problems faced by South Korean companies during executing their investment projects in Mongolia. In her research Grigorieva analyzes the results of economic cooperation between the Republic of Korea and Mongolia over the past 25 years and offers activities to be taken to expand the scope of their economic cooperation in the future. The methodological basis of teh research involves general and special research methods such as comparative historical analysis that allowed to define the state of the problem based on the analysis of different sources; statistical method that allowed to trace back quantitative changes in trade and economic bilateral relations between Mongolia and the Republic of Korea; and logical method that defined problems and trends in studying Mongolian - South Korean investment relations. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that this is a rather understudied topic and the author defines trends in the trade turnover between Mongolia and the Republic of Korea during the aforesaid period. The author concludes that against the active cooperation between Mongolia and the Republic of Korea, their economic relations are still have much to catch up with in political and sociocultural environment. Trade relations between Mongolia and the Republic of Korea show positive dynamics, with ups and downs, however, have a declining tendency. 

Keywords: investment cooperation, foreign direct investment, Mongolian-South Korean relations, trade and economic relations, Republic of Korea, Mongolia, exports, imports, economy, foreign trade

References:
Bazarov V.B., Grigor'eva Yu.G. Dinamika mongolo-koreyskoy vneshney torgovli / V.B. Bazarov, Yu.G. Grigor'eva // Vlast'. – 2015. – № 8. – S. 123.
Li Chzhe Eng, Chzhe Song Khun, Kim Khong Chzhin, Gantumur M. Khangukgiope chzhinchkhul' khvaktepanan [Investitsionnaya sreda Mongoliya i metody privlecheniya yuzhnokoreyskikh kompaniy] / Chzhe Eng Li, Khun Chzhe Song, Khong Chzhin Kim, M. Gantumur. – Seul: KIEP, 2012. – C. 225-227.
Mongol Ulsyn statistikiyn emkhtgel. 1990-2016 [Stat. sb. Mongolii]. – Ulan-Bator.
Pak Chzhi Von. Mongolkenchzhee teueichzhonsongva khangukgvae chzhonnyakchzhok kheprekpanan [Vneshneekonomicheskaya zavisimost' Mongolii i ee strategicheskoe sotrudnichestvo s Respublikoy Koreya] / Chzhi Von Pak // Koreysko-sibirskie issledovaniya. – Seul, 2012. – № 3. – C. 348.
The Export–Import Bank of Korea [Eksportno-importnyy bank Respubliki Koreya]. – Rezhim dostupa:https://www.koreaexim.go.kr/ site/main/index001 (30.09.2017)
Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Korea and the Government of the Mongolian People’s Republic on the Mut

Abstract: The article is devoted to the questions of integration in the territory of the former Soviet Union. The author analyzes advantages of  the Customs Union as a form of integration. Then the author provides which state interests are implemented in connection with the inclusion of Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus into the Customs Union. The article includes analysis of positive and negative features of the integration among the said countries. The author then attempts to predict the further development of the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan.

Keywords: integration, Customs Union, customs regulation, state interests, EurAsEC

References:
Mansurov T.A. Tamozhennyy soyuza – reshayushchiy etap evraziyskoy integratsii // Evraziyskaya integratsiya: ekonomika, pravo, politika. 2010. № 7. S. 39
Tekst vystupleniya opublikovan na ofitsial'no sayte Komissii Tamozhennogo soyuza. URL: http://www.tsouz.ru
Kasenov U.T. Bezopasnost' Tsentral'noy Azii: natsional'nye, regional'nye i global'nye problemy. Almaty, 1998. S. 199
Manov B.G. Novoe o mezhgosudarstvennoy integratsii // Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava. 2005. № 9. S. 166
Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i natsional'noe zakonodatel'stvo / Otv. red. Yu.A. Tikhomirov. M., 2009. S. 345
Zhamkoch'yan S.S. Tamozhennoe pravo Evropeyskogo Soobshchestva / Pod red. A.V. Fedorova. SPb., 2001. s. 31
Kostenko M.L., Lavrenova N.V. ES posle Maastrikhta: federatsiya, konfederatsiya ili mezhdunarodnaya organizatsiya? // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 1994. № 4. S. 105
Shumilov V.M. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe ekonomicheskoe pravo. M., 2001. S. 53
Egorov A.E. Pravovaya integratsiya i ee soderzhanie // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2006. № 6. S. 74
Matveevskiy Yu.A. Integratsionnye p